[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector with Metafun (again)

2018-12-04 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
{a+b+c+d} \quad 53 \doublebracket{a+b+c+d}$ \blank 54 $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad 55 \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank 56 $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad 57 \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank 58 $\overbar

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-22 Thread Hans Hagen
k $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\o

[NTG-context] Macro to write a vector (Metafun) is broken

2018-03-20 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
{a+b+c+d}$ \blank > $\overparent{a+b+c+d} \quad \underparent {a+b+c+d} \quad > \doubleparent {a+b+c+d}$ \blank > $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad > \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank > $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-15 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
\quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \underrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank \stoptext Wo

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-07 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
> \setupmathstackers > [top] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \setupmathstackers > [bottom] > [color=darkred, >alternative=mp] > > \starttext > > $\overbracket {a+b+c+d} \quad \underb

Re: [NTG-context] Package esvect and Context

2016-06-06 Thread Hans Hagen
d}$ \blank $\overbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbrace {a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebrace {a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overbar {a+b+c+d} \quad \underbar{a+b+c+d} \quad \doublebar{a+b+c+d}$ \blank $\overleftarrow {a+b+c+d} \quad \overrightarrow {a+b+c+d} $ \blank $\underleftarrow {a+b+

Re: [NTG-context] \mathextensible{21FE}

2014-04-24 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
}} There might be a better way to achieve that in Context, I don't know. \setupbodyfont[xits] \starttext \starttabulate[|l|lm|] \NC \tex{overleftarrow} \NC \overleftarrow{top} \NC\NR \NC \tex{overrightarrow} \NC \overrightarrow{text} \NC\NR \NC \tex{overleftrightarrow

Re: [NTG-context] \mathextensible{21FE}

2014-04-24 Thread Elspeth McGullicuddy
. For the present I will content myself with something like \math{\overset{f}{-\kern-1ex\rightarrowtriangle}} There might be a better way to achieve that in Context, I don't know. \setupbodyfont[xits] \starttext \starttabulate[|l|lm|] \NC \tex{overleftarrow} \NC \overleftarrow{top

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-07-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an interface to easily define such commands. So If not, what can I do so that I can use it? ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-07-11 Thread Jesse Alama
the \overleftarrow and \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is \overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this isn't available in ConTeXt, or, at least, it is not available by default. I tried

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-07-11 Thread Aditya Mahajan
. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is \overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this isn't available in ConTeXt, or, at least

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-06-30 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an interface to easily define such commands. So If not, what can I do so that I can use it? ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow as defined in plain tex. This does not work

[NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-06-28 Thread Jesse Alama
I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is \overleftrightarrow

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-06-28 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Jesse Alama wrote: I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and \overrightarrow commands, but one thing